About UsInsuranceLinksPeopleResourcesScholarshipsServicesTrainingWhat's NewWorkshopsSide Nav

The nurses, library aides and bus drivers picketing on West Ridge Road in Rochester Thursday afternoon want people to remember one number: $14,000.

"That's an average pension of an average retiree for CSEA," says Bess Watts, a library worker at Monroe Community College. "Yet they're continuing to squeeze every dime and we've made sacrifices."

CSEA is the Civil Service Employees Association. About 15 members staged the impromptu demonstration after waking to hear of the all night legislative session that resulted in an agreement to change the pension system. "It should have never been part of the budget bill anyway," says Watts. "It's too complicated."

To be clear, none of the people holding home made signs will see any change to their retirement or pension under the agreement. Only people who are newly hired and will compromise a group called Tier VI.

Governor Cuomo had threatened a government shutdown without reform measures to the retirement and pension system. The question now is whether this compromise represents the "historic change" he sought.

The governor wanted to increase the retirement age by three years to 65. What he got was 63 - a one year increase.

He wanted a tiered system where workers who earn more pay more into their pension- in this case 4, 5, or 6 percent. Most workers will pay a half point increase over current tier V employees (3.5 percent). Though some will pay more and others less.

And Cuomo wanted a 401-K option for employees. What he got was a limited plan for non-union employees making more than $75,000.

This agreement limits- but does not ban entirely- the old practice of employees working lots of overtime late in their career to pad pension rates.

"I think it was a fair compromise," says Monroe County Executive Maggie Brooks. She says pension costs in the county have gone up 140 percent since 2010. Yet any real relief under this plan won't come until Tier VI hires make up a significant portion of the county payroll.

"Short term it doesn't really do anything to relieve the burden on taxpayers locally," says Brooks. "Twenty to 25 years from now it will be a significant impact on taxpayers."